Whisk raid: Difference between revisions

Whisk raid (view source)

Revision as of 10:49, 2 April 2024

48 bytes added , 2 April 2024

m

Grammar and structure

VisualWikitext

Admin

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

376

edits

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 === The Whisk raid (blitzkrieg) ===
-As soon as Jack announced his Whisk page on Facebook, Foodjacks who are always continually monitoring his activities immediately sounded the alarm. What Jack did not realise is that, unlike YouTube comments, where he has absolute control on censoring critique and banning "haters", Whisk had zero functionality of that. Users can leave comments under the recipe and also replicate said recipe as their own "custom version", leading to troll creations such as "POORMAN'S ROAST DOG". These replicated creations are also featured under the original recipe itself.
+As soon as Jack broadcasted the launch of his Whisk page on Facebook, vigilant Foodjacks, who consistently track his activities, swiftly raised the alarm. What Jack failed to realize was that Whisk, unlike YouTube, does not afford him the same level of dominion over censoring criticism and expelling 'haters'. On Whisk, users have the liberty to comment directly under recipes and can even recreate recipes, posting them as their own 'custom version'. This feature led to the emergence of mock recipes, such as "POORMAN'S ROAST DOG", appearing alongside the original on the recipe page.
+Following the announcement, Jack's Whisk page details and the comment feature were shared on his Kiwi Farms thread, which precipitated a full-blown raid by the Foodjacks.
-Subsequently, Jack's Whisk page, along with the ability to leave comments, was posted on his Kiwi Farms thread, it lead to a full scale Foodjack raid.
 == References ==